"APC presidential ticket: Buhari, Kwankwaso’s supporters set for showdown" sun newspaper, 6/22/14
Buhari, Kwankwosa, two faces of the same Coin
Neither Buhari nor Kwankwosa would make good leadership in Nigeria, a multi-ethno religious society. It is absolutely impossible to be a religious zealot and at the same time be a good, fair and just leader in a multi-religious society. Because it is impossible to serve two masters, one religion and the other secularity, at the same time. It is obvious the servant would favor one over the other. The false belief by Hausa/Fulani military and civilian leaderships that one can serve two master is one of the major problem that have bewitched Nigeria. Hausa/Fulani military and civilian governments failed Nigeria and sent the country 50 years backwards, because it is impossible for a devout Muslim or a religious zealot to differentiate Islamic theocracy or Islamic religion, from the state.
Both Buhari and Kwankwosa and most Hausa/Fulani political class are scholarly Islamic zealots heavily schooled in Islamic theocracy and therefore incapable of leading a multi-ethno religious country like ours. So it is no surprise that over 28 years of Hausa/Fulani leadership was complete failure and retrogression in national development. Too much love for religion only lead to intolerance and discrimination against none observant of the religious faith. Both Buhari and Kwankwosa are diehard Islamists and would never have love for Nigerians of other faiths. And both like most Hausa/Fulani elites would therefore deepen ethnic, religious and tribal rivalry in Nigeria.
If Benue, Plateau, Adamawa, Nasarawa, Kogi, Taraba, with good percentage of none Muslims are truly northern states and not pawns in the Hausa/Fulani rabid quest for power, then let them give us presidential candidate. And why north if they too are called north, after all What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Sunday, June 22, 2014
Saturday, June 21, 2014
Islam is truly a religion of violent peace, however, not by choice.
Islam is truly a religion of violent peace, however, not by choice.
As for the Islamic insurgency in Nigeria we must hold northern elders, political and religious leaders responsible. Yes, Islam has history of violence but we must not hold the Prophet Mohammed (peace being onto him) responsible. Because Mohammed (PBOH) as we can recall was an orphan raised by a relative and was evidently poor. A look back in history would show that Mohammed (PBOH) and Mohammedians were peace loving and Islam was founded on the principle of peace and for the eluviation of pain of sufferings of the poor. In the beginning Mohammed (PBOH) and his followers were constantly forced to defend their belief, lives and even their right to exist by constant aggression from godless medinians. Many times, Mohammed (PBOH) was ostracized from the land, from the present Saudi Arabia. Even in exile, Mohammed (PBOH) was pursued and attacked by then godless Saudis who thought that Mohammedianism was infringing in their corrupt way of lives. It should be recalled that Christ and earlier Christians had the same experience from the Jews and Romanians. The difference was that while earlier Christians preach, love, peace even at death, Mohammedians who were confronted with constant aggression chose to match violence with violence. The violence which initially was only a means of survival in the mist of overwhelming aggression eventual become part of Islamic religion. This is why every Muslim would always say that it is a sin to attack and kill innocent person but okay to attack and kill one who attacks you. Truly, this Islamic doctrine and position to defend and attack ones' aggressor for self- preservation is logical. However, there is a caveat and that is, to majority of today's none scholarly Muslims a none Muslims is an infidel, and therefore an enemy with either perceived passive or active aggression against Islam and its followers. So today's Islamic aggression has origin in historic persecution and unjustified killing of earlier Muslims by the ungodly Medinians. To remedy, reduce and eventually eliminate Islamic violence require education and abolition of the word infidel and unbeliever from the Koran, from Islamic texts and from the psych of Islamic faithfuls.
Mohammed (PBOH) an orphan, raised poor, if not for super natural intervention ordinarily could not had risen from the ashes to world recognition with over 2 billion diehard followers. Like Christianity, that Islam had a supper natural origin is evidently not in doubt. It would be foolishness to deny that an orphan, poor Mohammed (PBOH) whose influence in today's world is only comparable to Christ's, was an extraordinary being.
As for the Islamic insurgency in Nigeria we must hold northern elders, political and religious leaders responsible. Yes, Islam has history of violence but we must not hold the Prophet Mohammed (peace being onto him) responsible. Because Mohammed (PBOH) as we can recall was an orphan raised by a relative and was evidently poor. A look back in history would show that Mohammed (PBOH) and Mohammedians were peace loving and Islam was founded on the principle of peace and for the eluviation of pain of sufferings of the poor. In the beginning Mohammed (PBOH) and his followers were constantly forced to defend their belief, lives and even their right to exist by constant aggression from godless medinians. Many times, Mohammed (PBOH) was ostracized from the land, from the present Saudi Arabia. Even in exile, Mohammed (PBOH) was pursued and attacked by then godless Saudis who thought that Mohammedianism was infringing in their corrupt way of lives. It should be recalled that Christ and earlier Christians had the same experience from the Jews and Romanians. The difference was that while earlier Christians preach, love, peace even at death, Mohammedians who were confronted with constant aggression chose to match violence with violence. The violence which initially was only a means of survival in the mist of overwhelming aggression eventual become part of Islamic religion. This is why every Muslim would always say that it is a sin to attack and kill innocent person but okay to attack and kill one who attacks you. Truly, this Islamic doctrine and position to defend and attack ones' aggressor for self- preservation is logical. However, there is a caveat and that is, to majority of today's none scholarly Muslims a none Muslims is an infidel, and therefore an enemy with either perceived passive or active aggression against Islam and its followers. So today's Islamic aggression has origin in historic persecution and unjustified killing of earlier Muslims by the ungodly Medinians. To remedy, reduce and eventually eliminate Islamic violence require education and abolition of the word infidel and unbeliever from the Koran, from Islamic texts and from the psych of Islamic faithfuls.
Mohammed (PBOH) an orphan, raised poor, if not for super natural intervention ordinarily could not had risen from the ashes to world recognition with over 2 billion diehard followers. Like Christianity, that Islam had a supper natural origin is evidently not in doubt. It would be foolishness to deny that an orphan, poor Mohammed (PBOH) whose influence in today's world is only comparable to Christ's, was an extraordinary being.
Tuesday, June 17, 2014
More than meets the eye
More than meets the eye
Under the current security situation of Islamic insurgency led by the youths of the Muslim North any such innocent unique mass movement especially by the Northern young men should have been reported to authorities in all their transit states and cities before commencement of such movement. Given the current insurgency, the state governments from where these people originated should have known that their indigenes were making this mass movement. These people if they were intelligent, none-insurgent they should have reported their movement if not for any other reason, at least for their own safety from mass mob and lynching in the hands of their potential hosts who are disillusioned by the mass murdering of people by the Muslim youths insurgency. 500 well trained insurgency is more than a battalion of irregular soldiers capable of overrunning a city of in a split second.
I am also of the view that South East policy makers must see the wisdom in maintaining within the confines of the law a regulated vigilante and militia force for minor internal security challenges within SE and for initial response to unwarranted provocations from without. I believe that a measure of force is required to maintain mutual fear and respect.
Though ironical, but peace is guaranteed by the readiness, the ability to prosecute war. In short terms Peace is the product of either war or mutual fear and or respect. Historically and contemporary, those that love peace but hate war never had peace because in a practical sense peace and war are mutually inclusive with war being superior of the two. Why, because perceived predisposition to peace neither guarantees the absence of war, nor peace, but perceived war-likeness preponderancely guarantees peace.
The history of mankind, of empires, of emperor, of, kingdoms, kings, colonialism, even of religion, is more or less the history of wars and conflicts between, people, kingdoms and or religion.
-
So war and not peace defines humanity better. Those who or whose ancestry had the means, the ability and the will to wedge wars not only defines the world politics but also divided the earth's bounties of land, island, waters, mountains, nations borders and sovereignty.
Cesar and his Roman empire, Hannibal and his empire, alexander the great and his empire, Peter De Great and Russia Empire, gungesta con and mongolia empire, the barbarians, the British empire, the Japanese empire, the China empire, the othman empire the beveria empire, america empire, and all poweful nations and or people in human history were powerful not because of their love and desire for peace but rather because through wars and the will to make wars they decide and define human history, human morality, power, politics, property ownership, and territory boundaries of the nation states. Like in the past, today' s powerful nations or world powers are so described, feared and respected because they possess the means, ability and will to wedge wars so as to impose their Will and define and shape world politics, morality and social order. Simply put those with means, ability and will to make wars have and will continue to control, governments,
resource, buying and selling, define and shape political, social or moral order either international or nation state so levels or both.
So it is no surprise that the Nigeria north upon which Nigeria military institutions and department, Nigeria's means to make war is varsely located determines, political, and economic order of the country. The falacy that the north is poor only but figment of imagination of those who make and believe this atrocious and false statement perhaps just to make themselves feel good. It is not by peace but by war that Othorman Dan Fodio, the found of Sokoto caliphate captured and conquered large expanse of land in the today's north and south west of nigeria
Under the current security situation of Islamic insurgency led by the youths of the Muslim North any such innocent unique mass movement especially by the Northern young men should have been reported to authorities in all their transit states and cities before commencement of such movement. Given the current insurgency, the state governments from where these people originated should have known that their indigenes were making this mass movement. These people if they were intelligent, none-insurgent they should have reported their movement if not for any other reason, at least for their own safety from mass mob and lynching in the hands of their potential hosts who are disillusioned by the mass murdering of people by the Muslim youths insurgency. 500 well trained insurgency is more than a battalion of irregular soldiers capable of overrunning a city of in a split second.
I am also of the view that South East policy makers must see the wisdom in maintaining within the confines of the law a regulated vigilante and militia force for minor internal security challenges within SE and for initial response to unwarranted provocations from without. I believe that a measure of force is required to maintain mutual fear and respect.
Though ironical, but peace is guaranteed by the readiness, the ability to prosecute war. In short terms Peace is the product of either war or mutual fear and or respect. Historically and contemporary, those that love peace but hate war never had peace because in a practical sense peace and war are mutually inclusive with war being superior of the two. Why, because perceived predisposition to peace neither guarantees the absence of war, nor peace, but perceived war-likeness preponderancely guarantees peace.
The history of mankind, of empires, of emperor, of, kingdoms, kings, colonialism, even of religion, is more or less the history of wars and conflicts between, people, kingdoms and or religion.
-
So war and not peace defines humanity better. Those who or whose ancestry had the means, the ability and the will to wedge wars not only defines the world politics but also divided the earth's bounties of land, island, waters, mountains, nations borders and sovereignty.
Cesar and his Roman empire, Hannibal and his empire, alexander the great and his empire, Peter De Great and Russia Empire, gungesta con and mongolia empire, the barbarians, the British empire, the Japanese empire, the China empire, the othman empire the beveria empire, america empire, and all poweful nations and or people in human history were powerful not because of their love and desire for peace but rather because through wars and the will to make wars they decide and define human history, human morality, power, politics, property ownership, and territory boundaries of the nation states. Like in the past, today' s powerful nations or world powers are so described, feared and respected because they possess the means, ability and will to wedge wars so as to impose their Will and define and shape world politics, morality and social order. Simply put those with means, ability and will to make wars have and will continue to control, governments,
resource, buying and selling, define and shape political, social or moral order either international or nation state so levels or both.
So it is no surprise that the Nigeria north upon which Nigeria military institutions and department, Nigeria's means to make war is varsely located determines, political, and economic order of the country. The falacy that the north is poor only but figment of imagination of those who make and believe this atrocious and false statement perhaps just to make themselves feel good. It is not by peace but by war that Othorman Dan Fodio, the found of Sokoto caliphate captured and conquered large expanse of land in the today's north and south west of nigeria
Sunday, June 15, 2014
Monday, June 9, 2014
Yahoo online debate with wimp Midnite Stalker
News article in the yahoo news, 6/9/14
"Florida Judge Disbarred Over Lying About Relationship With Prosecutor"
I Posted
The Justice aren't blind, it has the eyes of the Judge. see complete post in my blog
Midnite Stalker respondaed
1. He stopped you for your brake light not working.
2. You did not give the registration 'On Demand'. By your own admission, you spent time asking..., begging..., and trying to make him understand.... It was only after that that you gave the driver's license, then the registration. That is not 'On Demand'.
3. I am a Black man of African descent. I've gone to court and had tickets dismissed. I've also had police officers not write tickets even when I deserved one. How you speak to and approach other people determines how they will react to you.
I respond to Midnite Stalker
"Midnite Stalker" Your name says it all about you, a midnite stalking angel. The name, aka, aliases, nickname we consciously or unconsciously assume reflect our up-bringing, class, family and mindset. So your online name gave you out, you're not the saint you're pretending to be.
I never said that all police officers or that all Judges are prejudicial. You're very lucky and must be living in a totally different world where there is no prejudice, no Rodney King, no Amadu Dialo etc. In Maryland and in USA the right for freedom of movement is the law. Both the law, common courtesy and decency demand that the police informs a citizen the reason for arrest, for traffic stop.
I was within my right to ask why I was stopped, because I neither knew nor made aware that my brake light was out. I understand, like me you came from a dark continent were citizens have no right, not even right to life but unlike me you still cling to that mentality, the slave mentality, the right-less mentality. But I know better and I am free because I live in a free country and I intended to fully claim and defend my right otherwise I have not learnt anything from this great country. I am no freedom fighter however I have nothing against those that fight for their right and freedom. But I believe you're the kind that called Martin Luther Junior JR, 'a trouble maker.'
That you broke the law and a bad cop let you off the hook only means that there are bad cops out there that take law onto their hands. Have it crossed your mind that such cop that let you off the hook while you broke the law because you played a wimp might arrest an innocent citizen who broke no law but stood on his lawful right. It is better to obey the law than to seek leniency, Mr. Righteousness Midnite Stalker
Tuesday, June 3, 2014
The Justice aren't blind, it has the eyes of the Judge
The Justice aren't blind, it has the eyes of the Judge
I just return from a court hearing where I was found guilty by Judge Lisa A.H, Johnson of the District Court of Maryland for Prince George's County located at Courthouse 14735 Main Street, Upper Marlboro, MD 20774. And here are the details of this court case.
On March, I was stopped by a county police officer. Having pulled me over, the officer approached me and demanded my Driver's license and vehicle registration but failed to tell me why he pulled me over and why he needed my Driver's license and vehicle registration. So I asked him, "Sir, why did you stop me" and he responded "because I am a police officer". I literarily begged him to tell me why he pulled me over but he did not bulge. He insisted that I must give him my driver's license and Registration first. I tried to make him understand that being a police officer is not enough to stop and profile a law abiding citizen but my logics were waste of time for him. So I gave him my driver's license and then reached my glove box compartment for my registration and he then told me that he stopped me because one of my break lights was out.
But because there were other documents and letters in my glove compartment I took me extra few seconds to find my vehicle registration. However, before I could pull the registration out the officer have already left for his service vehicle, but before he left he said to me "when you find the registration tap your horn and wave the registration and do not step out of the car." Just as he entered his car I tapped my horn and waved the registration. About 25 minutes later the Officer returned to me and I tried giving him my registration but he refused it saying that he does not need it because he found all my information using my driver's license. However, he issued me two tickets, one for repair order for the defective break light and the other, a $## ticket for not 'producing my registration on demand.'
So I challenged the $## ticket based on the fact that I produced my registration On Demand which is what the law stipulated but the police officer disagreed and Judge Lisa A.H. Johnson agreed with the officer that I did not produce my Registration on demand. In her ruling Judge Johnson said that On Demand means immediately. According to Judge Johnson, On Demand means instantaneous but I disagree.
The reason I challenge this $## ticket was not because of the monetary cost but because I believe the ticket was unjust, issued with malice and for the police officer's unprofessional conduct and intimidation. He issued me the $## ticket because I asked him why he stopped me. In the court the police officer said I argued with him without substantiating or giving the details of the argument. My asking why he stopped me may be the argument he stated before the court. In stating that I argued with him the Officer was exploiting Judge Johnson's bias in favor of the Police. In almost all her Judgments that I witnessed on this particular day, Judged Johnson treated the police as the victim and the citizen defendants like villains and brutes the police should be protected from.
But as I said, this police officer issued me this ticket just because I asked to know why he stopped me. But Judge Johnson saw it differently and I was neither surprise nor in pain in paying the ticket along with the court cost because it is a general belief that Blacks of African descent never receive justice neither from African American police officers nor from African American Judges when the parties involved are all blacks. I had wanted to appeal this judgment but the Judgment letter the court gave me did not advise me on appeal.