sovereignty is none transferable

sovereignty is none transferable

Folk sovereignty never leaves the people; it is ever resident with the people. Sovereignty comes with tremendous authority but it is not the same thing as authority. Authority is an aspect of the manifestation of sovereignty, the superior overlord. Sovereignty is never delegated. In fact in a republic, the primary difference between sovereignty and authority is that one can be delegated while the other is absolute. I make this distinction because one incompetent Shitnator,  Abiriba claims that the people surrenders their sovereign power to the Legislature. How could he say that people transferred  the sovereignty to the Legislature? How could this be if the people still have the power to sack the Legislature, the government any time any day? Can one lose something and still have it? Abriba either do not understand sovereignty or he is a dictator. How could people part ways with their sovereignty if they still and always have the power to sack any government any time any day?

Sovereignty is like a crown, kings do not give up their crowns to their proxies, rather they impact them with authority. It is common sense, if the King gives his crown to one proxy how could he delegate the next proxy? As you know, the King can delegate and impact authority to as much proxies as he needs. The King is able to delegate and impact authorities to many of his subject because the crown is still with him. Once the crown leaves him the power to delegate or impact authority would be lost. Likewise sovereignty never leaves the people. Mr Abiriba should do his home work or take his incompetence and go back to his village.