I thought this man claims SAN

I thought this man claims SAN?

"One is when there is a sovereignty, which is in operation." What does he mean by a sovereignty in operation?

"The other is when there is a breakdown of sovereignty, either by military interruption or breakdown of law and order, as we had in Kenya." What do SAN Ahamba mean by break down of Sovereignty? Do this SAN think Sovereignty as an aspect of law and not the lordship of the citizenry over the government. Even in military dictatorships the sovereign power of the citizenry remains absolute. Do this SAN say that during the 43 years of military dictatorships Nigeria was not sovereign. To stifle or suffocate something is not the same as to conjure or profess its inexistence. Yes military dictatorships tend to undermine the sovereign power of the people over the government but in a republic like Nigeria, citizens' sovereign power over the governorships is ever absolute. It seems that this SAN is in the same league with Senator Abaribe who believes that the citizenry transferred its sovereign power to the Legislative arm of the government; nothing could be further from the truth.


Sovereignty is neither negotiable nor transferable, Folk sovereignty never leaves the people; it is ever resident with the people. Sovereignty comes with tremendous authority but it is not the same thing as authority. Authority is an aspect of the manifestation of sovereignty, the supreme overlord. Sovereignty is never transferable. In fact in a republic, the primary difference between sovereignty and authority is that one can be delegated while the other is absolute. I make this distinction because one incompetent Shitnator, Abaribe and now SAN Ahamba claim that the people surrender their sovereign power to the Legislature; that the Legislature is sovereign. In a true democratic society this claim is criminal and treasonable because even military dictatorship cannot make this wild claim. How could they say that people transferred their sovereign power to the Legislature? How could this be if the people still have the power to sack the Legislature, the government, anytime any day? Can one lose something and still have it? Abaribe and Ahamba either do not understand sovereignty or they are dictators. How could people part ways with their sovereignty if they still and always have the power to sack any government any time any day? Sovereignty is like a crown, kings do not give up their crowns to their proxies; rather they impact them with authority. It is common sense, if the King gives his crown to one proxy how could he delegate the next proxy? As you know, the King can delegate and impact authority to as much proxies as he needs. The King is able to delegate and impact authorities to many of his subject because the crown is still with him. Once the crown leaves him the power to delegate or impact authority would be lost. Likewise sovereignty never leave the people. Mr Abaribe and Ahamba should  redo their home work or take their ignorance  back to the planet they come from.